To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting...
Therefore the skillful leader subdues the enemy's troops without any fighting...
Sun Tzu On the Art of War
Everything else is an attempt to make up for failure in leadership and excellence.
Generally a stupid bloody waste.
That's where lies come in handy. People have to be convinced to feed themselves into the “stupid bloody waste machine” – People have to feel good about the murder and loss of everyone who gets in the way.
There's a good argument for a free press – to catch and discredit the lies before everyone starts feeling good about a bad thing. And if the press doesn't do it's job? That's a good argument for freedom of speech. Freedom of speech, especially for the people who are going to be told to go feed the bloody waste machine with their lives and bodies.
Greg Mitchell, Editor of Editor and Publisher talks about the failure of the press and the power of the citizen:
“While reporters and commentators continue to tiptoe around the question of whether Bush administration officials, right up to the president, deliberately misled the nation into the war, average and not-so-average citizens have raised the charge of “lies” and caused a stir usually reserved for reporters.”
One of the questions that isn't being directly addressed is, “why would reporters do this?” Fear is one of the commonly stated answers. The argument goes that the reporter knows that too many pointed questions can lead to being banned or ignored. Then there is “compromise by ideology” - which translates into the reporter being secretly on one side or another but pretending to be unbiased. And, of course, there is the “lazy reporter” scenario – it's just easier to take what they give you and pass it on as your own.
But there is an even uglier undercurrent that runs through all of this. Simple self interest. Take the right approach and over time, you too can be the shill, uh, spokesman for a President - Or land any number of other PR and Communication jobs in various think tanks and government agencies. This is a scary scenario that journalists don't like to talk about. Sure, they sometimes make fun of their peers who go over to the other side, but just how aggressive can a reporter be if they have any ambition that can be fed by a hand that they might otherwise bite. And what about those hidden perks that can't be tied directly to any particular position on a story that might get covered? Really, if Judith Miller was so wrong, and therefore, did such a bad job, why did she get what is reported to be a huge payoff when she left the New York Times? How does she show up so quickly writing for the Wall Street Journal?
Usually, when you really screw up, you don't get a bonus, do you?
Why aren't the high paid journalists investigating these questions?
An even bigger problem, and a deeper effect of the perversion of truth is the effect that news reporting has on the later perception that we call history. Todays news becomes tomorrows history. But what if today's news was a lie, or just half a lie?
This is not a new situation. The entire history of man has been skewed by the dictates of those in power. This is a big part of the heart of the stage play SAVAGES. It's not just the Indian Wars. It's the whole thing. When you look at the drama between the journalist, the general and the man who gets trapped inside the situation you see the history of the reporting of conflicts. We hear a lot of moaning and groaning about this today, but when wasn't it like this?
If we don't admit that these realities exist, we can never overcome them. And they can be overcome. There are too many examples of journalists who put themselves aside, or at least allowed the truth to shine through. The body counts out of Vietnam. Edward R. Murrow confronting McCarthy. The integrity of Walter Cronkite. But the huge rewards now available may be just too much for the average person who becomes successful in journalism. The access, the money, the power, the fame. Perhaps this is why so many of the current revelations about how reporters have mishandled the present situation has come from people who are not considered to be journalists by much of the press and by those who don't want what they have to say to have a wide audience.
When you read SAVAGES, imagine their counterparts back in Washington during that same time period. Who among them who knew what was really going on would ever have spoken openly about it and exposed what the real motivations were behind the reporting and the conduct of the war? Then fast forward to now.